<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 882 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438075</link>
    <description>Maintainability of an appellate challenge under GST was considered in light of the Supreme Court&#039;s exclusion of the COVID-19 period and grant of a 90-day limitation window from 01.03.2022; the appellate authority&#039;s longer delay calculation did not alter that exclusion and, even after excluding 15.03.202028.02.2022, the statutory limitation window expired by end May 2022, rendering the challenge time-barred and warranting dismissal. Reliance on a precedent that extended limitation where certified copies were delayed due to counsel or client COVID infection was distinguished because the present filing occurred after normalization of the pandemic period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 882 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438075</link>
      <description>Maintainability of an appellate challenge under GST was considered in light of the Supreme Court&#039;s exclusion of the COVID-19 period and grant of a 90-day limitation window from 01.03.2022; the appellate authority&#039;s longer delay calculation did not alter that exclusion and, even after excluding 15.03.202028.02.2022, the statutory limitation window expired by end May 2022, rendering the challenge time-barred and warranting dismissal. Reliance on a precedent that extended limitation where certified copies were delayed due to counsel or client COVID infection was distinguished because the present filing occurred after normalization of the pandemic period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>