<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 865 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438058</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, stating that the modification of the refund claim by the lower authorities without issuing a notice under Rule 14 could not be upheld. They directed the amount of Rs. 3,09,347/- to be credited back to the Cenvat account if possible and left the issue of cash refund under the CGST Act to be resolved by the concerned authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 May 2023 08:58:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 865 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438058</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, stating that the modification of the refund claim by the lower authorities without issuing a notice under Rule 14 could not be upheld. They directed the amount of Rs. 3,09,347/- to be credited back to the Cenvat account if possible and left the issue of cash refund under the CGST Act to be resolved by the concerned authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>