<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 861 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438054</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, a Public Sector Undertaking, in a case involving the valuation of goods cleared to job-workers under Central Excise Valuation Rules. The Tribunal upheld the Appellant&#039;s valuation methodology under Rule 4, rejecting the department&#039;s contention for Rule 8 application. Additionally, the Tribunal criticized the department&#039;s approach of ignoring excess duty payments while confirming short payments, citing legal errors. The Tribunal also supported the Appellant&#039;s argument on revenue neutrality and CENVAT credit eligibility. Furthermore, the Tribunal agreed with the Appellant on the time-barred nature of the Show Cause Notice, setting aside the order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 May 2023 14:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 861 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438054</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, a Public Sector Undertaking, in a case involving the valuation of goods cleared to job-workers under Central Excise Valuation Rules. The Tribunal upheld the Appellant&#039;s valuation methodology under Rule 4, rejecting the department&#039;s contention for Rule 8 application. Additionally, the Tribunal criticized the department&#039;s approach of ignoring excess duty payments while confirming short payments, citing legal errors. The Tribunal also supported the Appellant&#039;s argument on revenue neutrality and CENVAT credit eligibility. Furthermore, the Tribunal agreed with the Appellant on the time-barred nature of the Show Cause Notice, setting aside the order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>