<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 860 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438053</link>
    <description>The penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 for transporting imported goods was challenged. The appellate authority found that Rule 26, which pertains to excisable goods subject to excise duty, does not apply to imported goods. Consequently, the penalty of Rs. 2.5 Lacs was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 May 2023 13:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 860 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438053</link>
      <description>The penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 for transporting imported goods was challenged. The appellate authority found that Rule 26, which pertains to excisable goods subject to excise duty, does not apply to imported goods. Consequently, the penalty of Rs. 2.5 Lacs was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>