<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 851 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438044</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, confirming the validity of the exemption claimed under Section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act for long-term capital gains from the sale of shares. The Tribunal found the transactions genuine, supported by documentary evidence, and dismissed the revenue&#039;s allegations of tax evasion. The addition made by the Assessing Officer was deemed baseless, leading to the deletion of the consequential addition by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 May 2023 12:11:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 851 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438044</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, confirming the validity of the exemption claimed under Section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act for long-term capital gains from the sale of shares. The Tribunal found the transactions genuine, supported by documentary evidence, and dismissed the revenue&#039;s allegations of tax evasion. The addition made by the Assessing Officer was deemed baseless, leading to the deletion of the consequential addition by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>