https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307990 Limitation for an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act begins only when the statutory right to seek appointment of an arbitrator accrues under Article 137. That right arises after notice is served and the other party fails to concur in the appointment within fifteen clear days. The mere expiry of the contract does not itself start limitation, because the Section 8 procedure must first be triggered. On the facts, the applications were filed after notice and within the prescribed period, so they were not time-barred and the contrary view was legally incorrect. en-us Wed, 20 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 May 2023 11:11:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307990 Limitation for an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act begins only when the statutory right to seek appointment of an arbitrator accrues under Article 137. That right arises after notice is served and the other party fails to concur in the appointment within fifteen clear days. The mere expiry of the contract does not itself start limitation, because the Section 8 procedure must first be triggered. On the facts, the applications were filed after notice and within the prescribed period, so they were not time-barred and the contrary view was legally incorrect. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Jan 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307990