<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 289 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32785</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order regarding the classification of goods. The judgment focused on the proper interpretation of classification rules, the distinct identities of goods, and the applicability of relevant case laws to determine the correct classification under the Customs Tariff Heading.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 289 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32785</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order regarding the classification of goods. The judgment focused on the proper interpretation of classification rules, the distinct identities of goods, and the applicability of relevant case laws to determine the correct classification under the Customs Tariff Heading.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>