<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 817 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438010</link>
    <description>An asset reconstruction company that acquires financial assets under section 5 of the SARFAESI Act is treated as the lender by statutory deeming fiction, with all corresponding rights vested in it; lack of registration of the assignment does not, by itself, negate that consequence, so a section 7 IBC application may be maintained. A separate section 7 proceeding against a corporate guarantor for the same debt is also maintainable after admission against the principal borrower, because the guarantor&#039;s liability is coextensive with the borrower&#039;s under section 128 of the Contract Act. The admitted debt and default remained undisputed, and the insolvency admission was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 May 2023 11:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 817 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438010</link>
      <description>An asset reconstruction company that acquires financial assets under section 5 of the SARFAESI Act is treated as the lender by statutory deeming fiction, with all corresponding rights vested in it; lack of registration of the assignment does not, by itself, negate that consequence, so a section 7 IBC application may be maintained. A separate section 7 proceeding against a corporate guarantor for the same debt is also maintainable after admission against the principal borrower, because the guarantor&#039;s liability is coextensive with the borrower&#039;s under section 128 of the Contract Act. The admitted debt and default remained undisputed, and the insolvency admission was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>