<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 181 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32780</link>
    <description>An assessee that has no manufacturing facility and fully subcontracts production to independent contractors on a principal-to-principal basis is not the manufacturer of the goods; the contractors are the actual manufacturers, so duty cannot be fastened on the assessee. Where that position is accepted, the extended period of limitation is unjustified and the consequential duty demand, interest and penalty cannot survive. The record also supported a bona fide belief of non-liability, reinforcing the absence of suppression or mala fide conduct. The impugned order was set aside and relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 181 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32780</link>
      <description>An assessee that has no manufacturing facility and fully subcontracts production to independent contractors on a principal-to-principal basis is not the manufacturer of the goods; the contractors are the actual manufacturers, so duty cannot be fastened on the assessee. Where that position is accepted, the extended period of limitation is unjustified and the consequential duty demand, interest and penalty cannot survive. The record also supported a bona fide belief of non-liability, reinforcing the absence of suppression or mala fide conduct. The impugned order was set aside and relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>