<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 803 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437996</link>
    <description>The court allowed the exemption application subject to exceptions, condoned the delay in filing the appeal, and upheld the determination of duty based on the rules applicable at the time of the search, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument for retrospective application of amended rules. The court dismissed the appeal, finding it unmerited, and no penalty was imposed on respondent no. 2.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 May 2023 08:48:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 803 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437996</link>
      <description>The court allowed the exemption application subject to exceptions, condoned the delay in filing the appeal, and upheld the determination of duty based on the rules applicable at the time of the search, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument for retrospective application of amended rules. The court dismissed the appeal, finding it unmerited, and no penalty was imposed on respondent no. 2.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>