https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69859 Dishonour of Cheque - Evidently, the petitioner cannot be allowed to be prosecuted for bald allegations, burden to prove whereof is on respondent No. 2 in view of admission of respondent No. 2 that he had signed the cheque which got dishonoured - Likewise, respondent No. 2 has admittedly acted in violation of mandate of The Income Tax Act - If the impugned FIR and proceedings arising out of the same is allowed to be sustained, it would amount in protecting and recognizing illegal acts of respondent No. 2. - HC en-us Sat, 20 May 2023 08:48:11 +0530 Sat, 20 May 2023 08:48:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69859 Dishonour of Cheque - Evidently, the petitioner cannot be allowed to be prosecuted for bald allegations, burden to prove whereof is on respondent No. 2 in view of admission of respondent No. 2 that he had signed the cheque which got dishonoured - Likewise, respondent No. 2 has admittedly acted in violation of mandate of The Income Tax Act - If the impugned FIR and proceedings arising out of the same is allowed to be sustained, it would amount in protecting and recognizing illegal acts of respondent No. 2. - HC Highlights Indian Laws Sat, 20 May 2023 08:48:11 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69859