<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 800 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437993</link>
    <description>A voluntarily signed cheque attracts the statutory presumption of liability under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and a signed blank cheque, if voluntarily handed over, does not by itself negate enforceability. The presumption is rebuttable, but rebuttal must be assessed at trial on a preponderance of probabilities. Allegations of a cash transaction contrary to the Income-tax Act, 1961 were treated as reinforcing the illegality of the complainant&#039;s version, and continuation of the criminal proceedings was viewed as supporting an unlawful transaction. The FIR and consequent proceedings were therefore quashed as an abuse of process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 May 2023 08:48:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 800 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437993</link>
      <description>A voluntarily signed cheque attracts the statutory presumption of liability under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and a signed blank cheque, if voluntarily handed over, does not by itself negate enforceability. The presumption is rebuttable, but rebuttal must be assessed at trial on a preponderance of probabilities. Allegations of a cash transaction contrary to the Income-tax Act, 1961 were treated as reinforcing the illegality of the complainant&#039;s version, and continuation of the criminal proceedings was viewed as supporting an unlawful transaction. The FIR and consequent proceedings were therefore quashed as an abuse of process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>