<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 286 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32778</link>
    <description>An exemption notification does not extinguish the statutory levy, and duty paid on exported excisable goods may still support a rebate claim where the rebate rules do not expressly bar it. Rule 12 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 governs grant and denial of rebate, and rebate cannot be refused on grounds not contemplated by that rule. The revenue&#039;s view that duty paid on exempt goods is merely a deposit was rejected as unsupported by the Act or Rules. On that basis, the refusal of rebate solely because the goods were covered by an exemption notification was unsustainable, and the assessee&#039;s rebate claim was entitled to succeed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 286 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32778</link>
      <description>An exemption notification does not extinguish the statutory levy, and duty paid on exported excisable goods may still support a rebate claim where the rebate rules do not expressly bar it. Rule 12 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 governs grant and denial of rebate, and rebate cannot be refused on grounds not contemplated by that rule. The revenue&#039;s view that duty paid on exempt goods is merely a deposit was rejected as unsupported by the Act or Rules. On that basis, the refusal of rebate solely because the goods were covered by an exemption notification was unsustainable, and the assessee&#039;s rebate claim was entitled to succeed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>