<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 374 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32776</link>
    <description>The High Court reversed the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel duty demand and penalty imposition in a case involving mis-declaration of imported goods as scrap instead of steel flat bars. The Court upheld the duty demand based on the actual nature of the goods, emphasizing that mis-declaration allowed questioning of the declared value. While the penalty cancellation was maintained due to similar duty rates and a minor value difference, the Tribunal&#039;s interference with the Commissioner&#039;s order on valuation and duty demand was reversed, allowing the appeal on those grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 374 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32776</link>
      <description>The High Court reversed the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel duty demand and penalty imposition in a case involving mis-declaration of imported goods as scrap instead of steel flat bars. The Court upheld the duty demand based on the actual nature of the goods, emphasizing that mis-declaration allowed questioning of the declared value. While the penalty cancellation was maintained due to similar duty rates and a minor value difference, the Tribunal&#039;s interference with the Commissioner&#039;s order on valuation and duty demand was reversed, allowing the appeal on those grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>