<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 197 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32774</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to the Original Authority for verification on the EDI system glitch causing the higher duty payment. The Tribunal found it unjust for the Revenue to reject the refund claim solely based on unchallenged assessment, citing the Customs Act&#039;s provision for correcting clerical errors. The Original Authority was directed to decide on the refund claim within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 197 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32774</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to the Original Authority for verification on the EDI system glitch causing the higher duty payment. The Tribunal found it unjust for the Revenue to reject the refund claim solely based on unchallenged assessment, citing the Customs Act&#039;s provision for correcting clerical errors. The Original Authority was directed to decide on the refund claim within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>