<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 791 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437984</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for Assessment Year 2012-13, contesting the reassessment proceedings and quantum additions on merits. The Tribunal condoned the delay in the appeal due to Covid-19 lockdown and the appellant being a senior citizen. It held that the reassessment was unjustified as it was initiated solely based on a revenue audit objection without new tangible material, rendering the assessment bad-in-law. Consequently, the reassessment was deemed null and void.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 May 2023 09:08:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 791 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437984</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for Assessment Year 2012-13, contesting the reassessment proceedings and quantum additions on merits. The Tribunal condoned the delay in the appeal due to Covid-19 lockdown and the appellant being a senior citizen. It held that the reassessment was unjustified as it was initiated solely based on a revenue audit objection without new tangible material, rendering the assessment bad-in-law. Consequently, the reassessment was deemed null and void.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>