https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437956 The case involved issues regarding the admissibility of refund claims for specific periods and the denial and recovery of CENVAT credit on input services. The Tribunal remanded the matter for de novo adjudication, resulting in the sanctioning of cash refund for a significant amount while a minor amount was rejected. The Commissioner is yet to decide on the admissibility of refunds for another period. The Tribunal also remanded the denial and recovery proceedings to be considered alongside pending refund claims, allowing the appellant an opportunity for a hearing. The appeal was allowed through remand. en-us Fri, 24 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 May 2023 09:06:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437956 The case involved issues regarding the admissibility of refund claims for specific periods and the denial and recovery of CENVAT credit on input services. The Tribunal remanded the matter for de novo adjudication, resulting in the sanctioning of cash refund for a significant amount while a minor amount was rejected. The Commissioner is yet to decide on the admissibility of refunds for another period. The Tribunal also remanded the denial and recovery proceedings to be considered alongside pending refund claims, allowing the appellant an opportunity for a hearing. The appeal was allowed through remand. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 24 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437956