<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 67 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32766</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn after the appellants settled the determined amount under the Dispute Resolution Scheme (DRS), 2008, for short payment of service tax as a &quot;Clearing and Forwarding Agent.&quot; The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, but the settlement under the DRS led to the withdrawal of the appeal, emphasizing the importance of utilizing such schemes for efficient resolution of tax disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 67 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32766</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn after the appellants settled the determined amount under the Dispute Resolution Scheme (DRS), 2008, for short payment of service tax as a &quot;Clearing and Forwarding Agent.&quot; The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, but the settlement under the DRS led to the withdrawal of the appeal, emphasizing the importance of utilizing such schemes for efficient resolution of tax disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>