<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 827 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307958</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals of the revenue and cross-objections of the assessee. It rejected the condonation of delay in filing cross-objections, deemed the notice under Section 148 invalid, found the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to reopen the assessment under Section 147, and upheld the deletion of the addition of Rs. 20,93,725 to the assessee&#039;s income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 May 2023 13:21:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 827 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307958</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals of the revenue and cross-objections of the assessee. It rejected the condonation of delay in filing cross-objections, deemed the notice under Section 148 invalid, found the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to reopen the assessment under Section 147, and upheld the deletion of the addition of Rs. 20,93,725 to the assessee&#039;s income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>