<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1300 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307956</link>
    <description>Age and fee relaxation for a reserved category candidate were treated as eligibility concessions, not a lowering of the selection standard; a candidate who secured higher marks than the last selected general category candidate could therefore be counted against an unreserved vacancy on open merit. Horizontal reservations for women and sportspersons were held to be adjustable across categories and not subject to the carry-forward rule applicable to vertical reservations; suitable candidates from the same selection or the next eligible candidates had to be used instead. Alleged irregularities were not proved, so the selection was not disturbed and the State&#039;s position prevailed on the core reservation issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 May 2023 11:08:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1300 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307956</link>
      <description>Age and fee relaxation for a reserved category candidate were treated as eligibility concessions, not a lowering of the selection standard; a candidate who secured higher marks than the last selected general category candidate could therefore be counted against an unreserved vacancy on open merit. Horizontal reservations for women and sportspersons were held to be adjustable across categories and not subject to the carry-forward rule applicable to vertical reservations; suitable candidates from the same selection or the next eligible candidates had to be used instead. Alleged irregularities were not proved, so the selection was not disturbed and the State&#039;s position prevailed on the core reservation issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>