https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307955 The right to choose the medium of instruction at the primary level was treated as a fundamental right flowing from the right to education, freedom of speech and expression, and the rights of parents, citizens, and educational institutions to receive and impart knowledge through a chosen medium. The State may regulate educational standards, curriculum, and affiliation, but it cannot compel recognised schools or parents to adopt only the mother tongue or regional language as the medium of instruction. Policy provisions that cross from regulation into compulsion were held invalid to that extent, while the broader language policy was sustained where it did not infringe constitutional rights. en-us Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 May 2023 10:47:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307955 The right to choose the medium of instruction at the primary level was treated as a fundamental right flowing from the right to education, freedom of speech and expression, and the rights of parents, citizens, and educational institutions to receive and impart knowledge through a chosen medium. The State may regulate educational standards, curriculum, and affiliation, but it cannot compel recognised schools or parents to adopt only the mother tongue or regional language as the medium of instruction. Policy provisions that cross from regulation into compulsion were held invalid to that extent, while the broader language policy was sustained where it did not infringe constitutional rights. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307955