<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 744 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437937</link>
    <description>A dealer replacing a defective automobile part during the warranty period and receiving a manufacturer&#039;s credit note was held to receive valuable consideration for a taxable sale. The Court reasoned that, although a warranty is collateral to the main sale, the dealer&#039;s replacement of the part from its own stock or market purchase, followed by credit from the manufacturer on return of the defective part, involves monetary recompense linked to the transfer of goods and is not a gratuitous service. It confirmed that Mohd. Ekram Khan properly covers such arrangements and rejected the view that the dealer-customer and dealer-manufacturer transactions are wholly independent. The credit note was therefore exigible to sales tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 744 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437937</link>
      <description>A dealer replacing a defective automobile part during the warranty period and receiving a manufacturer&#039;s credit note was held to receive valuable consideration for a taxable sale. The Court reasoned that, although a warranty is collateral to the main sale, the dealer&#039;s replacement of the part from its own stock or market purchase, followed by credit from the manufacturer on return of the defective part, involves monetary recompense linked to the transfer of goods and is not a gratuitous service. It confirmed that Mohd. Ekram Khan properly covers such arrangements and rejected the view that the dealer-customer and dealer-manufacturer transactions are wholly independent. The credit note was therefore exigible to sales tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>