<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 743 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437936</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the revenue challenging the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was dismissed by the High Court. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the deletion of additions made under Section 69A for seized gold bullion and ornaments, the explanation provided for the identity of the original purchaser of the seized gold, timing discrepancies in the purchase invoice, applicability of section 292C(1) regarding ownership of assets, and reliance on CIT(A) observations regarding asset ownership. The stay application was also rejected by the court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 May 2023 08:38:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 743 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437936</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the revenue challenging the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was dismissed by the High Court. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the deletion of additions made under Section 69A for seized gold bullion and ornaments, the explanation provided for the identity of the original purchaser of the seized gold, timing discrepancies in the purchase invoice, applicability of section 292C(1) regarding ownership of assets, and reliance on CIT(A) observations regarding asset ownership. The stay application was also rejected by the court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>