<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 728 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437921</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for both assessment years, directing the AO to delete the additions made under Sections 68 and 69C. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided comprehensive documentation to prove the genuineness of the transactions and criticized the AO for relying on external reports and assumptions without concrete evidence. SEBI&#039;s findings played a crucial role in exonerating the assessee from any involvement in price manipulation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 728 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437921</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for both assessment years, directing the AO to delete the additions made under Sections 68 and 69C. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided comprehensive documentation to prove the genuineness of the transactions and criticized the AO for relying on external reports and assumptions without concrete evidence. SEBI&#039;s findings played a crucial role in exonerating the assessee from any involvement in price manipulation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>