<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 715 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437908</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court addressed the impact of unstamped or under-stamped contracts on arbitration agreements and clarified the intertwined nature of their existence and validity. Referring to relevant cases, the Court emphasized that an arbitration agreement must meet legal requirements to be considered valid. Additionally, the judgment explored the difference between obiter dicta and ratio decidendi, highlighting the binding nature of the principle on which a case is decided. Consequently, the Court dismissed the special leave petitions, emphasizing the importance of extracting binding legal principles from decisions and directing pending applications to be resolved accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 17:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 715 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437908</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court addressed the impact of unstamped or under-stamped contracts on arbitration agreements and clarified the intertwined nature of their existence and validity. Referring to relevant cases, the Court emphasized that an arbitration agreement must meet legal requirements to be considered valid. Additionally, the judgment explored the difference between obiter dicta and ratio decidendi, highlighting the binding nature of the principle on which a case is decided. Consequently, the Court dismissed the special leave petitions, emphasizing the importance of extracting binding legal principles from decisions and directing pending applications to be resolved accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>