https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307944 Sections 6 and 8 of the Gambling Act were upheld as constitutional because their presumptions and special evidentiary rules were treated as part of a scheme to suppress gambling, an activity linked to public order and morality. The Court found that the search and seizure safeguards, the requirement of credible information and inquiry, and the need for judicial satisfaction before the presumption operated prevented the burden-shifting mechanism from being arbitrary or unreasonable. The challenge under Articles 19 and 21 therefore failed. en-us Fri, 25 Jan 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 May 2023 15:52:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307944 Sections 6 and 8 of the Gambling Act were upheld as constitutional because their presumptions and special evidentiary rules were treated as part of a scheme to suppress gambling, an activity linked to public order and morality. The Court found that the search and seizure safeguards, the requirement of credible information and inquiry, and the need for judicial satisfaction before the presumption operated prevented the burden-shifting mechanism from being arbitrary or unreasonable. The challenge under Articles 19 and 21 therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Jan 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307944