<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1910 (7) TMI 2 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307943</link>
    <description>The court held the carriers liable for the loss of goods due to negligence, rejecting the carriers&#039; exemption claims based on contractual agreements. It emphasized statutory provisions under the Carriers Act of 1865, prohibiting carriers from limiting liability for losses caused by negligence or criminal acts. The court clarified the rights of subrogation for insurance companies, highlighting the need for strict interpretation of indemnity clauses. The case was remanded for further proceedings to determine damages, addressing procedural errors in the lawsuit&#039;s initiation by the insurance company instead of the Manufacturing Company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 1910 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 15:52:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1910 (7) TMI 2 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307943</link>
      <description>The court held the carriers liable for the loss of goods due to negligence, rejecting the carriers&#039; exemption claims based on contractual agreements. It emphasized statutory provisions under the Carriers Act of 1865, prohibiting carriers from limiting liability for losses caused by negligence or criminal acts. The court clarified the rights of subrogation for insurance companies, highlighting the need for strict interpretation of indemnity clauses. The case was remanded for further proceedings to determine damages, addressing procedural errors in the lawsuit&#039;s initiation by the insurance company instead of the Manufacturing Company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 1910 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>