<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 1123 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307941</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the National Commission&#039;s judgment, and remanded the case for fresh disposal, instructing the Commission to consider the observations made and decide in accordance with the law. The case emphasizes the strict liability of common carriers and the importance of clear, signed agreements to limit carrier liability under the Carriers Act, 1865.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 15:42:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 1123 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307941</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the National Commission&#039;s judgment, and remanded the case for fresh disposal, instructing the Commission to consider the observations made and decide in accordance with the law. The case emphasizes the strict liability of common carriers and the importance of clear, signed agreements to limit carrier liability under the Carriers Act, 1865.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>