<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 710 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307940</link>
    <description>The court determined that playing rummy with stakes at the respondent-Mahalakshmi Cultural Association constituted gambling, not a game of skill. It upheld police authority to raid premises suspected of illegal gambling under the Chennai City Police Act. The court clarified definitions of &quot;common gaming house&quot; and &quot;gaming,&quot; emphasizing possession of gaming instruments as evidence. While recognizing the Association&#039;s rights, it prohibited rummy with stakes and directed police action against illegal activities. The court modified the single Judge&#039;s order, allowing police intervention based on reliable information and closing the case without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 14:50:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 710 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307940</link>
      <description>The court determined that playing rummy with stakes at the respondent-Mahalakshmi Cultural Association constituted gambling, not a game of skill. It upheld police authority to raid premises suspected of illegal gambling under the Chennai City Police Act. The court clarified definitions of &quot;common gaming house&quot; and &quot;gaming,&quot; emphasizing possession of gaming instruments as evidence. While recognizing the Association&#039;s rights, it prohibited rummy with stakes and directed police action against illegal activities. The court modified the single Judge&#039;s order, allowing police intervention based on reliable information and closing the case without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>