https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307938 The Division Bench affirmed the termination of the respondent upheld by the Labour Court and High Court, considering the Law department as an industry under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The appellant's contention that the Law department does not qualify as an industry was pending further consideration. Emphasizing the need to analyze decisions and precedents, the court reinstated the respondent but left the decision on continuation to the appellant, deeming the orders indefensible. The appeal was allowed without costs. en-us Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 May 2023 14:15:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307938 The Division Bench affirmed the termination of the respondent upheld by the Labour Court and High Court, considering the Law department as an industry under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The appellant's contention that the Law department does not qualify as an industry was pending further consideration. Emphasizing the need to analyze decisions and precedents, the court reinstated the respondent but left the decision on continuation to the appellant, deeming the orders indefensible. The appeal was allowed without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307938