https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307937 A joint criminal appeal by the State against the acquittal of several accused was held incompetent because each acquittal is a separate order and the Criminal Procedure Code does not provide for a single appeal that could result in partial dismissal or partial abatement. The Court also reaffirmed that binding law comes from the Supreme Court, not earlier High Court decisions, and applied that principle to reject the appeal at the threshold for want of maintainability. en-us Wed, 20 Nov 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 May 2023 13:03:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307937 A joint criminal appeal by the State against the acquittal of several accused was held incompetent because each acquittal is a separate order and the Criminal Procedure Code does not provide for a single appeal that could result in partial dismissal or partial abatement. The Court also reaffirmed that binding law comes from the Supreme Court, not earlier High Court decisions, and applied that principle to reject the appeal at the threshold for want of maintainability. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Nov 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307937