<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 901 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307936</link>
    <description>Rummy is treated as a game predominantly of skill, and a game that is mainly or substantially skill-based falls outside gaming legislation. Under Section 15 of the A.P. Gaming Act, 1974, the exclusion for &quot;games of skill only&quot; is treated as synonymous with &quot;games of mere skill&quot; for this purpose. Accordingly, playing rummy with stakes, or the club deriving profit from the activity, does not by itself convert the activity into gaming under the Act. On that basis, the document states that rummy with stakes did not attract the A.P. Gaming Act, 1974 and the FIR alleging a common gaming house offence was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 12:38:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 901 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307936</link>
      <description>Rummy is treated as a game predominantly of skill, and a game that is mainly or substantially skill-based falls outside gaming legislation. Under Section 15 of the A.P. Gaming Act, 1974, the exclusion for &quot;games of skill only&quot; is treated as synonymous with &quot;games of mere skill&quot; for this purpose. Accordingly, playing rummy with stakes, or the club deriving profit from the activity, does not by itself convert the activity into gaming under the Act. On that basis, the document states that rummy with stakes did not attract the A.P. Gaming Act, 1974 and the FIR alleging a common gaming house offence was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>