<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 34 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32753</link>
    <description>The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the appellate authority for a fresh decision. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to consider the appellant&#039;s claim that the services availed were indeed related to business activities, as reflected in their books of accounts and considered as part of the cost of their final product. The stay petition and appeal were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 34 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32753</link>
      <description>The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the appellate authority for a fresh decision. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to consider the appellant&#039;s claim that the services availed were indeed related to business activities, as reflected in their books of accounts and considered as part of the cost of their final product. The stay petition and appeal were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>