https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437868 The Court ordered the release of the petitioner's imported goods within two weeks, addressing the wrongful detention and demurrage charges imposed by respondent No.3. The Court emphasized compliance with the Customs Act, 1962, and the Sea Cargo Manifest Regulation 2018, noting that private parties must pursue civil remedies for detention charges. Despite directions from Customs authorities to waive charges, respondent No.3 continued to demand fees, prompting the Court to mandate the release of goods and disregard private claims of detention and demurrage. The Court's decision focused solely on the release, leaving other issues unresolved. en-us Thu, 27 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Nov 2023 13:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437868 The Court ordered the release of the petitioner's imported goods within two weeks, addressing the wrongful detention and demurrage charges imposed by respondent No.3. The Court emphasized compliance with the Customs Act, 1962, and the Sea Cargo Manifest Regulation 2018, noting that private parties must pursue civil remedies for detention charges. Despite directions from Customs authorities to waive charges, respondent No.3 continued to demand fees, prompting the Court to mandate the release of goods and disregard private claims of detention and demurrage. The Court's decision focused solely on the release, leaving other issues unresolved. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 27 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437868