<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 675 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437868</link>
    <description>Imported goods were required to be released once customs authorities directed release and waived detention charges for the period under customs control. The private custodians&#039; insistence on detention and demurrage charges could not block release of the goods. Any separate claim for such charges could still be pursued independently through civil remedies in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 675 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437868</link>
      <description>Imported goods were required to be released once customs authorities directed release and waived detention charges for the period under customs control. The private custodians&#039; insistence on detention and demurrage charges could not block release of the goods. Any separate claim for such charges could still be pursued independently through civil remedies in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>