<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 667 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437860</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the penalty under Section 114A for misdeclaration of goods and undervaluation, reducing it to Rs. 5 lakhs. The Commissioner (Appeals) had set aside the penalty, but the Tribunal found the misdeclaration admitted by the importer and the higher valuation justified the penalty. The appeal was allowed in part, modifying the order and upholding the penalty at a reduced amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 08:45:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 667 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437860</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the penalty under Section 114A for misdeclaration of goods and undervaluation, reducing it to Rs. 5 lakhs. The Commissioner (Appeals) had set aside the penalty, but the Tribunal found the misdeclaration admitted by the importer and the higher valuation justified the penalty. The appeal was allowed in part, modifying the order and upholding the penalty at a reduced amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>