https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437851 The court upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decision to reject the petitioner's application for cross-examination of witnesses under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. It emphasized that the principles of natural justice were substantially complied with, and there was no prejudice to the petitioner. The court clarified that orders rejecting such applications are appealable under Section 26 of the Act and directed the petitioner to approach the Appellate Tribunal within a month. The court stressed the importance of procedural orders being challenged through the appropriate appellate process rather than writ petitions. en-us Fri, 21 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 May 2023 08:45:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437851 The court upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decision to reject the petitioner's application for cross-examination of witnesses under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. It emphasized that the principles of natural justice were substantially complied with, and there was no prejudice to the petitioner. The court clarified that orders rejecting such applications are appealable under Section 26 of the Act and directed the petitioner to approach the Appellate Tribunal within a month. The court stressed the importance of procedural orders being challenged through the appropriate appellate process rather than writ petitions. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 21 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437851