<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 27 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32745</link>
    <description>The Punjab and Haryana HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s remand order for fresh adjudication on the ground of violation of natural justice. The court accepted that the matter had been sent back for reconsideration and found no basis to admit the Revenue&#039;s challenge against that procedural direction. The operative effect was that the Tribunal&#039;s remand for a fresh decision remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 27 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32745</link>
      <description>The Punjab and Haryana HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s remand order for fresh adjudication on the ground of violation of natural justice. The court accepted that the matter had been sent back for reconsideration and found no basis to admit the Revenue&#039;s challenge against that procedural direction. The operative effect was that the Tribunal&#039;s remand for a fresh decision remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>