<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 647 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437840</link>
    <description>Interim stay conditions in writ appeals may be moderated where part of the disputed demand has already been deleted in earlier proceedings and the surviving liability is substantially lower. The Madras HC held that an existing deposit requirement was excessive in light of the reduced balance dispute, so the interim protection was continued on a lower deposit amount. Upon compliance, the bank attachment was to be lifted, with automatic vacation of the interim protection on default. The ruling reflects that interim burdens should remain proportionate to the live dispute and not impose an unduly harsh condition where part of the demand no longer survives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 18:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 647 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437840</link>
      <description>Interim stay conditions in writ appeals may be moderated where part of the disputed demand has already been deleted in earlier proceedings and the surviving liability is substantially lower. The Madras HC held that an existing deposit requirement was excessive in light of the reduced balance dispute, so the interim protection was continued on a lower deposit amount. Upon compliance, the bank attachment was to be lifted, with automatic vacation of the interim protection on default. The ruling reflects that interim burdens should remain proportionate to the live dispute and not impose an unduly harsh condition where part of the demand no longer survives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>