<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 646 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437839</link>
    <description>Assessment based on documents recovered during inspection was upheld despite objections to territorial competence and procedure, because the record did not show that the assessing officer lacked jurisdiction for the area concerned and the liability findings were supported by seized material. Where the demand had already been deposited and the matter had been examined on merits by the assessing authority, appellate authority and Tribunal, remand was treated as serving no useful purpose. The note emphasises that concurrent factual findings supported by documentary evidence do not warrant interference in tax appeal absent a substantial question of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 08:45:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 646 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437839</link>
      <description>Assessment based on documents recovered during inspection was upheld despite objections to territorial competence and procedure, because the record did not show that the assessing officer lacked jurisdiction for the area concerned and the liability findings were supported by seized material. Where the demand had already been deposited and the matter had been examined on merits by the assessing authority, appellate authority and Tribunal, remand was treated as serving no useful purpose. The note emphasises that concurrent factual findings supported by documentary evidence do not warrant interference in tax appeal absent a substantial question of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>