https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307929 The HC dismissed the fourth bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for offences under Section 132(1)(i) read with 132(5) of CGST Act. Despite the petitioner's custody period of one year and four months, the court found no change in circumstances since the rejection of the third bail application except for the extended custody. The court noted the case remains in pre-charge evidence stage despite the maximum sentence being five years. While dismissing the bail application, the HC directed the trial court to expedite the disposal of the case. en-us Tue, 17 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Apr 2025 10:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307929 The HC dismissed the fourth bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for offences under Section 132(1)(i) read with 132(5) of CGST Act. Despite the petitioner's custody period of one year and four months, the court found no change in circumstances since the rejection of the third bail application except for the extended custody. The court noted the case remains in pre-charge evidence stage despite the maximum sentence being five years. While dismissing the bail application, the HC directed the trial court to expedite the disposal of the case. Case-Laws GST Tue, 17 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307929