<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 1345 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307928</link>
    <description>The court quashed the orders allowing the accused to cross-examine the complainant and dismissing the petitioner&#039;s application for recall in a criminal case. The court held that the accused failed to disclose a specific defense, as required by law, and granted cross-examination without proper grounds. Consequently, the court found the orders to be illegal, set them aside, and disposed of the case in favor of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 08:44:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 1345 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307928</link>
      <description>The court quashed the orders allowing the accused to cross-examine the complainant and dismissing the petitioner&#039;s application for recall in a criminal case. The court held that the accused failed to disclose a specific defense, as required by law, and granted cross-examination without proper grounds. Consequently, the court found the orders to be illegal, set them aside, and disposed of the case in favor of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>