<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1551 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307903</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the liabilities remained outstanding, were not written off in the audited books of accounts, and were presumed to exist at the end of the relevant financial year. As the liabilities were not treated as bad debts or shown to have ceased to exist, the ITAT found no grounds to intervene with the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s findings. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 08:34:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1551 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307903</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the liabilities remained outstanding, were not written off in the audited books of accounts, and were presumed to exist at the end of the relevant financial year. As the liabilities were not treated as bad debts or shown to have ceased to exist, the ITAT found no grounds to intervene with the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s findings. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>