<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 604 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437797</link>
    <description>Service tax demand under Rent-a-Cab services was found unsustainable where it was based mainly on third-party material from departmental records, web sources, yellow pages and income-tax data, without independent investigation at the assessee&#039;s premises or business operations. The assessee rebutted the demand with salary bills showing the drivers were employees and a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate stating that the vehicles were operated as metered taxis, not as rent-a-cab services. In the absence of corroborative evidence to support the department&#039;s case, the demand was rejected and the impugned order was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 08:32:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 604 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437797</link>
      <description>Service tax demand under Rent-a-Cab services was found unsustainable where it was based mainly on third-party material from departmental records, web sources, yellow pages and income-tax data, without independent investigation at the assessee&#039;s premises or business operations. The assessee rebutted the demand with salary bills showing the drivers were employees and a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate stating that the vehicles were operated as metered taxis, not as rent-a-cab services. In the absence of corroborative evidence to support the department&#039;s case, the demand was rejected and the impugned order was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>