<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 275 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32729</link>
    <description>The court quashed the criminal proceeding under sections 276 and 277 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, against the petitioners. The court found that the petitioners had complied with the reassessment order, paid the revised tax amount and penalties, and there was no wilful negligence in tax payment. It was determined that continuing the criminal proceeding would amount to an abuse of the legal process. Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the petitioners and quashed the entire proceeding, including the rejection order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 275 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32729</link>
      <description>The court quashed the criminal proceeding under sections 276 and 277 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, against the petitioners. The court found that the petitioners had complied with the reassessment order, paid the revised tax amount and penalties, and there was no wilful negligence in tax payment. It was determined that continuing the criminal proceeding would amount to an abuse of the legal process. Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the petitioners and quashed the entire proceeding, including the rejection order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>