<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 597 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437790</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, holding that the processes of swaging and welding involved in creating Steel Tubular Poles constituted manufacturing under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision set aside the order for recovery of CENVAT Credit and penalties imposed by the Adjudicating authority, emphasizing that these processes transformed raw materials into marketable products, aligning with the definition of manufacture.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 May 2023 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 597 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437790</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, holding that the processes of swaging and welding involved in creating Steel Tubular Poles constituted manufacturing under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision set aside the order for recovery of CENVAT Credit and penalties imposed by the Adjudicating authority, emphasizing that these processes transformed raw materials into marketable products, aligning with the definition of manufacture.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>