https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437787 The Court held that the complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act was not maintainable as the mandatory demand notice was not served on the company. Despite arguments regarding the timeliness of the complaint and the specificity of allegations against a petitioner, the primary issue of non-service of the demand notice to the company rendered the complaint non-maintainable. Consequently, all related proceedings were set aside, and the petitions were allowed. en-us Thu, 11 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 May 2023 09:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437787 The Court held that the complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act was not maintainable as the mandatory demand notice was not served on the company. Despite arguments regarding the timeliness of the complaint and the specificity of allegations against a petitioner, the primary issue of non-service of the demand notice to the company rendered the complaint non-maintainable. Consequently, all related proceedings were set aside, and the petitions were allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437787