<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 593 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437786</link>
    <description>HC granted stay on GST payment for mining lease/royalty, aligning with SC&#039;s interim order in a similar case. Petitioner argued royalty is a tax, not a service payment, referencing precedent. The court connected this case with a related matter and suspended GST liability pending final resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 593 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437786</link>
      <description>HC granted stay on GST payment for mining lease/royalty, aligning with SC&#039;s interim order in a similar case. Petitioner argued royalty is a tax, not a service payment, referencing precedent. The court connected this case with a related matter and suspended GST liability pending final resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>