<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 584 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437777</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the order by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, which rejected the revision under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the pendency of a writ petition challenging reassessment proceedings did not constitute an appeal under Section 264(4)(a), thus allowing the revisional proceedings to continue. The Court directed the respondent to proceed with the revision process promptly, ensuring adherence to legal standards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 584 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437777</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the order by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, which rejected the revision under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the pendency of a writ petition challenging reassessment proceedings did not constitute an appeal under Section 264(4)(a), thus allowing the revisional proceedings to continue. The Court directed the respondent to proceed with the revision process promptly, ensuring adherence to legal standards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>