<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 574 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437767</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the Centralized Processing Centre (CPC) exceeded its jurisdiction in disallowing the expenditure towards Club subscription fees and Club services. The Tribunal emphasized that the expenses were not inherently personal and should not have been disallowed based solely on the auditor&#039;s recommendation. Consequently, the disallowance of Rs.4,47,990/- was deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 May 2023 08:24:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 574 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437767</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the Centralized Processing Centre (CPC) exceeded its jurisdiction in disallowing the expenditure towards Club subscription fees and Club services. The Tribunal emphasized that the expenses were not inherently personal and should not have been disallowed based solely on the auditor&#039;s recommendation. Consequently, the disallowance of Rs.4,47,990/- was deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>