<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 565 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437758</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of M/s Bharti Reality Ltd., allowing them to avail CENVAT credit on &#039;input services&#039; used for constructing buildings rented out for taxable services. The Tribunal held that the post-01.04.2011 amendment to rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, excluding services related to construction of buildings, was not applicable to the disputed period. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order denying the CENVAT credit was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 May 2023 09:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=713624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 565 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437758</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of M/s Bharti Reality Ltd., allowing them to avail CENVAT credit on &#039;input services&#039; used for constructing buildings rented out for taxable services. The Tribunal held that the post-01.04.2011 amendment to rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, excluding services related to construction of buildings, was not applicable to the disputed period. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order denying the CENVAT credit was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=437758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>